Search This Blog

Loading...

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Gun deaths versus car crash fatalities…who wins?


NRA philosophy

A lot of articles have been written about this new report by the Violence Policy Center, many simply documenting the number of deaths on each side with the conclusion that in ten states, more people have died from firearms than in motor vehicles.  It is the kind of study that the National Rifle Assn. (NRA) and its members cannot argue with, considering the recent increase in obstacle driving causing auto accidents, like texting, while you are on the road.

There is also a good analysis of the report on the New Trajectory site that goes into detail on the study findings with quotes that point out just how much new gun control regulations are needed.  The report accentuates that while auto deaths are on the decline due to years of education and injury prevention strategy, “firearm deaths continue unabated.”  In my view, entirely the result of NRA pressure on conservative state lawmakers caving to the sheer force.

I thought I would concentrate on just one state in the study to point out just how loose gun laws have led to more gun deaths.  The state is Arizona…where I live.  Yes, we have the loosest gun laws in the country and it is the result of a bunch of gun loving fanatics backed by a state legislature and Governor that bow to this group in order to be re-elected.  It is still the Wild West here and many residents are proud of it.  Others, progressives like me, look at these people with pity.

Arizona had 856 gun deaths in this study of 2009 data compared to 809 motor vehicle deaths.  Here’s another interesting statistic I calculated: although Arizona is 2.1 percent of the U.S. population, it has 2.7 percent of its gun deaths.  Arizona is number 2 in the country behind number 1 Michigan with 1,095 gun deaths to 977 motor vehicle deaths, with Virginia coming in 3rd with 836 gun deaths to 827 motor vehicle deaths.  You can see the other seven states in the report, above.

An interesting video on how gun ownership is diminishing:
Kristen Rand, Violence Policy Center’s legislative director, comments that firearms are the only consumer product not regulated by the federal government for health and safety.  Thanks to the NRA and its head thug Wayne LaPierre.  Americans are experiencing new safety regulations that protect them in their cars and from others on the road.  But not so with guns. 

Rand thought gun deaths exceeding motor vehicle deaths was “stunning,” considering that 90 percent of U.S. households own cars when only one-third own firearms.  More than stunning, it is tragic.


Members of Arizona legislature

Charles Heller of Arizona Citizens Defense League, a gun rights group, has his own figures.  To show you the inaccuracy of the NRA led, gun worshipping gang, Heller says there were 50,000 who died in crashes compared to 32,000 from guns, the latter close.  The VPC reports from their study that there were 31,236 firearms deaths in 2009, 36,361 motor vehicle deaths.  In Arizona there were 12.98 gun deaths per 100,000 residents versus 12.27 motor vehicle deaths. 

Arizona is hell-bent on allowing its gun toters to carry their weapons anywhere anytime.  They can already carry them into bars but were recently denied taking them on college campuses and in public buildings.  The state legislature has threatened to introduce both bills again.  State Sen. Ron Gould is running for the U.S. Congress and is firmly behind both pieces of legislation.  It is obvious that Gould is courting the gun-totin Tea Party that has a firm hold on Arizona politics.

TucsonSentinel.com quotes VPC on tightened gun regulations and education: “Comprehensive regulation of the firearms industry and its products could include: minimum safety standards (i.e., specific design standards and the requirement of safety devices); bans on certain types of firearms such as “junk guns” and military-style assault weapons…”  Now this would sound reasonable to most thinking individuals but not to dimwit gun nuts.

Arizona’s own Charles Heller, who rejected calls for weapons design changes, said: "You want them to be dangerous or they're no damn good. Making them safer adds complexity, and that has unintended consequences.  The only true safety in firearms is the person using it."

And therein lays the problem.  Too many of those “persons” walking around the streets of Arizona and other states throughout the country with a weapon they hardly know how to use.

8 comments:

  1. Thanks for yet another great post. The video is scary stuff but then, what's happening on the streets of America is scary stuff- no thanks to the NRA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The graph they show for total gun deaths vs. total car deaths says it all. And remember, 2009 is the latest data they have. At that time, there were 10 states that surpassed car deaths. Now, two years later, how many more are there? We will know if a couple years when the data finally gets tallied. Meanwhile, the gun lobbies keep pushing their "more guns in more hands" agenda. Pretty soon, gun-related deaths will be the number-one non-health cause do death in the U.S.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dimwit gun nuts! Interesting I could think of a thousand words in which I could use to refer to you but why lower myself to your level. The numbers in these reports tell us nothing at all. How many gun deaths are from criminal activity and gang violence? We don't know the numbers don't say! How many are from law abiding citizens? We have no idea. How many of the deaths in those numbers were actually self defense and saved a victims life? Yet again we have no stinking idea cause the numbers do not say! The only thing it says is there was near 32000 deaths caused by guns that year. Very few guns on todays market are lacking safety devices. Which means nothing cause mechanical devices fail. You want to make guns safer then lets educate people “ALL PEOPLE“! Banning guns will do nothing at all in terms of safety only hurt the honest people.

    TRAVIS FONTE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even any dimwit gun nut should be able to figure out that the above means there are too many guns on the street and that is because of the NRA and gun worshippers like you. Apparently you've had your head in the "outhouse" too long.

      Jack E. Dunning
      Nasty Jack Blog

      Delete
    2. What does one fit outhouses with?

      It isn't in the outhouse as much as what goes into an outhouse.

      And quite a bit of it at that!

      Unfortunately, no plumbing or we could talk about fourflsuher,

      Maybe far more than four flushes!

      Delete
  4. Heeyyy, I thought those were Justices Scalito and Thomas!

    Too many right wing clowns out there for comfort.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The curious thing that many studies do to try to give reason to gun deaths is many have a flaw in the calculation of the context of any death from the result of a firearm. How so? They simplify the count by counting it as "homicide by gun", dismissing the context as to how a gun was used/misused that resulted in a death. There's easily an arguable difference between the gun death of a rapist trying to commit the act, a death from accident, and a criminal killing someone. Because one instance advocates guns and their legitimacy, one would advocate meaningful education and the discussion of gun control, the latter to justify "get rid of them all!!".

    The studies in question simply say "3 gun deaths". Though not untrue. It is dishonest.

    I'm not going to disclose my position if im pro/con guns. My advocacy is that to come to the truth of the matter involving this, its not that simple. We owe it to ourselves and those lost by whatever scenario involving a gun. To get the facts contextually right, and not react purely off of emotion and slippery slope arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  6. An article to consider....

    http://www.neontommy.com/news/2012/07/doing-math-guns

    ReplyDelete

NASTY JACK IS NOW OPEN FOR COMMENTS